Golden power and FDI screening: the “economic security” hurdle
If you are a US or UK corporate acquiring an Italian target in tech, banking, energy, defence or critical infrastructure, or if you are a non-EU fund looking to take control of a strategic Italian asset, the Golden Power regime now operates under a reformed framework that directly affects your deal timeline and certainty.
Italy’s Golden Power rules were already broad, covering sectors from 5G and cloud computing to financial services and semiconductors. What changed in January 2026 is both the legal definition of “strategic interest” and the way Golden Power reviews coordinate with EU authorities.
The trigger for this reform was political. In late 2025, the Italian government used Golden Power to impose conditions on UniCredit’s proposed acquisition of Banco BPM, citing risks to “economic and financial security.” The European Commission responded by opening an infringement procedure, arguing that Italy’s FDI rules were encroaching on EU competences in banking supervision and capital movement.
Law No. 4 of 15 January 2026 was Italy’s answer. It recalibrates the regime without dismantling it. Here are the three changes that matter for your deal:
Update 1: The new “economic and financial security” test
Golden Power reviews can now explicitly assess threats to national economic and financial security, not just traditional national security concerns like defence or critical infrastructure.
In practice, this means transactions involving Italian banks, insurance companies or systemically important financial institutions can be screened based on concerns about credit flows, savings protection and exposure to foreign jurisdictions. Our clients in the financial services sector have noted that this broadens the scope significantly, especially for deals involving non-EU buyers.
Our top tip: If your target generates revenue from financial services, expect Golden Power to be a live issue. Early engagement with advisors who understand both the technical FDI rules and the political context is essential.
Update 2: Coordination with EU banking and competition authorities
One of the key procedural shifts is that Golden Power reviews in the banking and insurance sectors now follow, rather than run parallel to, European Central Bank (ECB) and EU merger control clearances.
The new rules state that the clock for Golden Power notifications starts only after EU supervisory procedures have concluded. This was designed to address the Commission’s infringement concerns by ensuring Italy does not pre-empt EU-level decisions.
Our top tip: Your deal timeline must now account for a staggered regulatory sequence. If you need ECB approval, Golden Power review will add weeks or months after that clearance. Structure your long-stop dates and financing commitments accordingly. We typically advise clients to assume a minimum of 60–90 days for Golden Power after EU clearance is granted.
Update 3: Pre-notification has become a critical tool
Italy’s Golden Power framework allows buyers to engage in pre-notification discussions with the Prime Minister’s office before formally filing. Given the expanded “economic security” scope and the coordination complexity, we are seeing far more sophisticated buyers using this route.
Pre-notification allows you to test whether your transaction will trigger a full review, what concerns the authorities might raise and what behavioural or structural remedies could be on the table. Our corporate clients have found this particularly useful in banking and tech deals, where the political sensitivity is high but the legal boundaries are unclear.
Our top tip: If your acquisition involves a target with significant Italian operations, workforce or customer base in a sensitive sector, initiate pre-notification discussions at the term sheet stage. This can save you from unpleasant surprises post-signing.